Yay! It is no longer mearly efficient to kill these 3, but given we hav 3 explicit attempted first degree murders, one of which succeeded, it is now morally obligatory to stop them by any means not including collateral damage.
If the 3 that saved the pretagonist valued human life, they would have been obligated to kill Shade. What is there reasoning for NOT doing so?
Note: No, calling the cops is not an option when he can freeze the cops and would be just as dangerous, if not more so, in prison. Unless you just don’t give a damn what happens to the other inmates and gangs in the prison with him, you sadistic, mioptic fool.
Yay! It is no longer mearly efficient to kill these 3, but given we hav 3 explicit attempted first degree murders, one of which succeeded, it is now morally obligatory to stop them by any means not including collateral damage.
If the 3 that saved the pretagonist valued human life, they would have been obligated to kill Shade. What is there reasoning for NOT doing so?
Note: No, calling the cops is not an option when he can freeze the cops and would be just as dangerous, if not more so, in prison. Unless you just don’t give a damn what happens to the other inmates and gangs in the prison with him, you sadistic, mioptic fool.